Developing an Integrated Pedagogical Model for Digital Colour Education to Bridge Theory and Authentic Design Practice in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59088/y6qd8c54Keywords:
digital colour education, art and design education, integrated pedagogy, experiential learning, practice-based learning, higher educationAbstract
Digital colour competence has become increasingly important as design practice moves across screen-based, interactive and computational environments, yet colour education in higher education may continue to separate conceptual instruction from authentic digital practice. This study develops and empirically grounds an Integrated Pedagogical Model for Digital Color Principles that connects theoretical understanding with authentic design activity. Guided by an interpretivist, social-constructivist orientation, the research employed a qualitative case study within a Digital Media Art programme at Guangzhou Huashang College, China. Evidence was generated through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, reflective journals, student design artefacts and curriculum documents and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and qualitative synthesis. The analysis identified four interrelated pedagogical requirements: authentic theory-practice integration, collaborative knowledge construction, reflective learning and technology-enhanced design practice. These requirements, together with the study's theoretical foundations and formative-assessment evidence, informed a six-component model comprising theoretical conceptual learning, authentic digital design practice, collaborative learning, reflective practice, a technology-enhanced learning environment, and continuous formative feedback and assessment. Implementation evidence indicated stronger integration of conceptual reasoning with design practice, greater learner autonomy and more explicit professional judgement. The study contributes an empirically grounded pedagogical architecture for digital colour education and argues that technology becomes educationally productive when embedded within coherent cycles of conceptualisation, making, critique, reflection and revision.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zhu Ziyou, Mohd Fawazie bin Arshad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA). This is a human-readable summary of (and not a substitute for) the license. You are free to: (a) Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; (b) Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:

