Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Patient-Specific 3d Printing for Precision Orthopedic Surgery: A Clinical Validation Study of Personalized Surgical Planning and Outcome Optimization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59088/kjtwp076Keywords:
artificial intelligence, 3D printing, precision orthopedic surgery, surgical planning, deep learning, patient-specific instrumentation, clinical validationAbstract
Orthopedic reconstruction procedures are becoming increasingly complex, requiring highly accurate preoperative planning to achieve optimal anatomical restoration and functional recovery. Conventional planning methods depend largely on surgeon experience, two-dimensional radiographic interpretation, and manual image analysis, which may reduce surgical precision and contribute to variability in operative outcomes. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) printing have created new opportunities for precision orthopedic surgery; however, prospective clinical evidence supporting their combined application remains limited. This prospective cohort study clinically validated an AI-integrated patient-specific 3D printing workflow by comparing its performance with conventional surgical planning in complex orthopedic reconstruction. Eighty-four consecutive patients treated at a tertiary academic center between January 2024 and March 2026 were included, comprising 42 patients who underwent AI-assisted personalized planning with patient-specific 3D printing and 42 matched historical controls receiving conventional planning. The AI workflow incorporated deep learning-based bone segmentation using a 3D U-Net model (Dice coefficient = 0.94), automated anatomical landmark detection, virtual deformity correction, and fabrication of patient-specific cutting guides and implants. Primary outcomes included surgical correction accuracy and implant positioning precision, while secondary outcomes assessed planning time, operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy exposure, postoperative functional recovery, pain, and complications over a 12-month follow-up period. Compared with conventional planning, the AI-assisted workflow significantly reduced planning time (18.5 ± 5.6 vs. 47.2 ± 12.8 minutes; p < 0.001), improved angular correction accuracy (1.8° ± 0.7° vs. 4.3° ± 1.5°; p < 0.001), and enhanced implant positioning precision (2.1 ± 0.9 mm vs. 5.4 ± 2.1 mm; p < 0.001). Operative time decreased by 29% (94.3 ± 18.6 vs. 132.8 ± 25.4 minutes; p < 0.001), blood loss by 37% (215 ± 68 vs. 340 ± 92 mL; p < 0.001), and fluoroscopy exposure by 46% (28.4 ± 9.2 vs. 52.6 ± 14.8 seconds; p < 0.001). Patients treated with the AI-integrated workflow also demonstrated significantly greater improvements in functional recovery, including higher Harris Hip Scores (89.6 ± 6.8 vs. 76.4 ± 9.2; p < 0.001) and Knee Society Scores (86.2 ± 7.4 vs. 71.8 ± 10.5; p < 0.001), together with a lower overall complication rate (11.9% vs. 30.9%; p = 0.032). These findings demonstrate that integrating AI-driven surgical planning with patient-specific 3D printing substantially enhances surgical precision, operative efficiency, and postoperative functional outcomes in complex orthopedic reconstruction. The results support the potential of this technology as a clinically effective precision surgery platform, although larger multicenter prospective studies and regulatory evaluation are required before routine implementation in clinical practice.