Are you considering submitting a review or original research work to a Global Social Science & Humanities Jornal? Join our writing community to have access to:

• a simple technique for submitting manuscripts that doesn't require any formatting.
• Complete language editing report provided at no cost at the time of submission to assist you in evaluating and improving your work before it is submitted for peer review.
• editors who are committed and involved in their respective areas.
• high editorial standards, guaranteeing a thorough peer review procedure for all published works.
• Publication that is swift and effective, with complete openness on all publishing metrics and turnaround times.
• Increased visibility, impact, and reach for your study via open access.
• all ownership and copyright of your published research will be retained.
• Save money on a variety of writing services from top suppliers, to help make your manuscript the best it can be.

Support is always accessible from our editorial office. Speak with your Editorial Assistant if you have any inquiries about your responsibilities as an editor at Global Social Science & Humanities Jornal
.

How to peer review for Global Social Science & Humanities Journal

The reviewer report should comprehensively critique the submission and consist of much more than a few brief sentences. Global Social Science & Humanities Jornal does not require a specific structure for reports, however, a suggested format is:

• Summary
• Major issues
• Minor issues

We encourage reviewers to help authors improve their manuscript. The report should give constructive analysis to authors, particularly where revisions are recommended. Where reviewers do not wish authors to see certain comments, these can be added to the confidential comments to the Academic Editor.

While expectations vary by discipline, some core aspects that should be critiqued by reviewers may include:

• Are the research questions valid?
• Is the sample size sufficient?
• Is there necessary ethical approval and/or consent and was the research ethical?
• Are the methods and study design appropriate for answering the research question?
• Do the experiments have appropriate controls?
• Is the reporting of the methods, including any equipment and materials, sufficiently detailed that the research might be reproduced?
• Are any statistical tests used appropriate and correctly reported?
• Are the figures and tables clear and do they accurately represent the results?
• Has previous research by the authors and others been discussed and have those results been compared to the current results?
• Are there any inappropriate citations, for example, not supporting the claim being made or too many citations to the authors' own articles?
• Do the results support the conclusions?
• Are limitations of the research acknowledged?
• Is the abstract an accurate summary of the research and results, without spin?
• Is the language clear and understandable?

To help authors receive timely reviews, reviewer reports should be submitted via the manuscript tracking system on or before the agreed deadline. Reviewers should contact Global Social Science & Humanities Jornal if they are unable to meet the deadline so an alternative date can be arranged.

We encourage reviewers to focus their reports on objectively critiquing the scientific aspects of the submission, including the soundness of the methodology and whether the conclusions can be supported by the results. At the end of their review, we ask reviewers to recommend one of the following actions:

• Publish Unaltered
• Consider after Minor Changes
• Consider after Major Changes
• Reject

However, it is important to note that the overall decision will be made by the Academic Editor.